Question

Notify Me Bookmark

Match the graph of f, below, with that of its derivative.

Match the graph of f, below, with that of its derivative.Match the graph of f, below, with that of its derivative.

Image text
Match the graph of f , below, with that of its derivative.
I

Detailed Answer

0 0

Please enter your email here. You will get email when this question is answered by our tutor.

Doubtrix Logo

Problem is not yet solved!

Click on Notify me to get email when question is answered.

Join Doubtrix with 7-days free trial

  • Icon Correct & Verified Answers
  • Icon No AI-Generated Answers
  • Icon Video Solution for Difficult Questions
  • Icon Work With Experts to Reach at Correct Answers
Notify me Login Sign Up

Similar/Related Questions

Consider the circuit shown in Figure 2 below, with gm1 = 100 mA/V, gm2 = 20 mA/V, gm3 = 3 mA/V, R1 = 2 kΩ, R2 = 1 kΩ, VDD = 5 V, and all NMOS devices are in saturation. Channel length modulation and the body effect should be ignored for this problem. (And, hopefully, it is obvious that gm1, gm2, and gm3 correspond to the device transconductances of NMOS devices M1, M2, and M3, respectively: if this wasn't obvious, note that the next time you see something like this, I probably won't spell it out for you so explicitly. if at all, so please make a mental note of these kinds of things.) a) Determine the numerical small-signal voltage gain: i) Av = Vout/Vin in units of V/V and ii) |Av| in units of dB. Be sure to indicate whether your numerical answers are positive-valued or negative-valued (numerical answers with ambiguous signs will receive little, if any: credit, partial or otherwise). List your numerical answers in proper engineering notation format with appropriate units, and show your work. b) Determine the numerical small-signal resistance "seen" looking into node Vin. List your numerical answer in proper engineering notation format with appropriate units, and show your work. c) Determine the numerical small-signal resistance "seen" looking into node Vx. List your numerical answer in proper engineering notation format with appropriate units, and show your work. d) Determine the numerical small-signal resistance "seen" looking into node Vy. List your numerical answer in proper engineering notation format with appropriate units, and show your work. e) Determine the numerical small-signal resistance "seen" looking into node Vout. List your numerical answer in proper engineering notation format with appropriate units. and show your work.
Solution
0 0

Consider the amplifier shown below along with a description of its voltage gain in the s-domain (Av(s)) a) Determine expressions for the poles and zeros, if any. Show your work! You may leave your answers as a function of Rb instead of R1||R2. b) Crudely graph a straight line approximation for the Bode Plot of |Vo/Vin| as a function of frequency. If there are multiple poles you may assume that the one at the output (containing terms at the output: RL, Rd, C2 ) is larger. Av(s) = -gm Rb/Rb + 1/sC1 (Rd||(1/sC2 + RL)) Where: Rb = R1||R2 and the notation Z1(s)||Z2(s) denotes that impedances Z1 and Z2 are in parallel
Solution
0 0

You are at a weekly meeting of your Astronomy Club. The club members are excited because access is now available to real-time data on light intensity from the star at the center of another planetary system. The plane of the system is parallel to the direction from the system toward the Earth, so it is possible to detect transits: a planet passes between the Earth and the star of the system, so that the light from the star dims slightly. The planets of this system are very close to their parent star and revolve very rapidly. Planet X in this system has a period of 2.00 Earth days! As you graph the incoming data from the star as it appears on a computer, you see the dip in light intensity. You make a printout of the graph of light intensity versus time and compare it to the graph from 2.00 days ago. The latest graph shows a difference. The time interval from the beginning of the dimming of the light from the star to the return to full brightness took much longer than it did during the observation 2.00 days ago, and the light became significantly dimmer than the observation 2.00 days ago. As you continue to watch the data over several days, the light data every 2.00 days is similar to that in the first graph. Then, 10.0 days after you noticed the unusual behavior, you see it again! You realize that the unusual behavior must be due to a double occultation: two planets are lined up between you and the other star: Planet X and Planet Y! You inform your club members about the data and they excitedly ask you to find out the percentage by which the semimajor axis of the Planet Y is larger that of Planet X. %

Solution
0 0