Question

Notify Me Bookmark

No fringes are seen in a single-slit diffraction pattern if the distance to the screen is greater than the slit width. the wavelength is less than the slit width. the wavelength is greater than the slit width. the wavelength is less than the distance to the screen. the screen is far away.

No fringes are seen in a single-slit diffraction pattern if the distance to the screen is greater than the slit width. the wavelength is less than the slit width. the wavelength is greater than the slit width. the wavelength is less than the distance to the screen. the screen is far away.

Image text
No fringes are seen in a single-slit diffraction pattern if the distance to the screen is greater than the slit width. the wavelength is less than the slit width. the wavelength is greater than the slit width. the wavelength is less than the distance to the screen. the screen is far away.

Detailed Answer

2 0

Please enter your email here. You will get email when this question is answered by our tutor.

Answer
Doubtrix Logo

This Problem has been solved!

You'll get a detailed, step-by-step and expert verified solution.

Join Doubtrix with 7-days free trial

  • Icon Correct & Verified Answers
  • Icon No AI-Generated Answers
  • Icon Video Solution for Difficult Questions
  • Icon Work With Experts to Reach at Correct Answers
Login Sign Up
  • Student Reviews:
  • (2)
  • Correct answers (2)
  • Complete solution (2)
  • Step-by-step solution (2)
  • Fully explained (2)

Similar/Related Questions

The data was obtained from car crash experiments. The table values are the Subcompact: 59 59 52 51 59 chest deceleration data (g) for the dummy in the driver's seat. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the null hypothesis that the different weight Compact: 51 46 46 53 47 categories have the same mean. Do the data suggest that larger cars are Midsize: 47 53 46 45 53 safer? Full-size: 48 43 40 41 Should the null hypothesis be rejected? A. No, because the P-value is greater than the significance level. B. Yes, because the P-value is less than the significance level. C. Yes, because the P-value is greater than the significance level. D. No, because the P-value is less than the significance level. Do the data suggest that larger cars are safer? A. No. The null hypothesis is rejected, but the data suggest that the mean deceleration for larger cars is larger, not smaller. B. Yes, because the null hypothesis is rejected. The data suggest that the mean deceleration for larger cars is smaller. C. No, because the null hypothesis is not rejected. There is not sufficient evidence to state that any of the means are different from the rest.
Solution
0 0

Assume that a simple random sample has been selected from a normally distributed population and test the given claim. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses, test statistic, P-value, and state the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. A safety administration conducted crash tests of child booster seats for cars. Listed below are results from those tests, with the measurements given in hic (standard head injury condition units). The safety requirement is that the hic measurement should be less than 1000 hic. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the sample is from a population with a mean less than 1000 hic. Do the results suggest that all of the child booster seats meet the specified requirement? 808 742 1306 629 650 545 What are the hypotheses? A. H0 : µ > 1000 hic H1 : µ < 1000 hic C. H0 : µ = 1000 hic H1 : µ ≥ 1000 hic B. H0 : µ = 1000 hic H1 : µ < 1000 hic D. H0 : µ < 1000 hic H1 : µ ≥ 1000 hic Identify the test statistic. t = (Round to three decimal places as needed.) Identify the P-value. The P-value is (Round to four decimal places as needed.) State the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. (1) H0. There is (2) evidence to support the claim that the sample is from a population with a mean less than 1000 hic. What do the results suggest about the child booster seats meeting the specified requirement? A. There is not strong evidence that the mean is less than 1000 hic, and one of the booster seats has a measurement that is greater than 1000 hic. B. The results are inconclusive regarding whether one of the booster seats could have a measurement that is greater than 1000 hic. C. There is strong evidence that the mean is less than 1000 hic, but one of the booster seats has a measurement that is greater than 1000 hic. D. The requirement is met since most sample measurements are less than 1000 hic. (1) Reject (2) insufficient Fail to reject sufficient
Solution
0 0

The eruption height and the time interval after eruption of a geyser were measured and are shown below. Answer parts a-c. Height (x) 150 107 120 138 145 127 124 123 Interval after (y) 83 62 66 80 84 78 67 73 Click here to view a table of critical values for the correlation coefficient. 2 a. Find the value of the linear correlation coefficient r. r = (Round to three decimal places as needed.) b. Find the critical values of r from the table showing the critical values for the Pearson correlation coefficient using α = 0.05. The critical values are ± (Round to three decimal places as needed.) c. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a linear correlation between the two variables? A. No, because the absolute value of the correlation coefficient is greater than the critical value. B. Yes, because the absolute value of the correlation coefficient is greater than the critical value. C. Yes, because the absolute value of the correlation coefficient is less than the critical value. D. No, because the absolute value of the correlation coefficient is less than the critical value.
Solution
0 0